Redmi Note 9 Pro Camera Review

Redmi Note 9 Pro Camera Review

The squared-off camera bump on the rear may additionally surprise some Redmi Note series fans. The first shooter features a 48-megapixel resolution and f/1.79 aperture, and uses the new Samsung Isocell GM2 sensor. You do not get a 64-megapixel camera just like the one on the Redmi Note 8 Pro or other recent value-segment phones. That's primarily a results of the Redmi Note 9 Pro addressing a lower market tier with its lower prices – you are doing get a 64-megapixel camera with the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max.

Next thereto you will find an 8-megapixel wide-angle camera, which is pretty standard for this price index. The 2-megapixel depth sensor within the lower row is additionally basic and commonplace. What’s interesting is that the incontrovertible fact that the macro camera features a 5-megapixel resolution, which should be a pleasant raise from the barely-useful 2-megapixel ones we have seen in most phones lately.

Xiaomi boasts of an improved Night Mode, super phase detection autofocus, and a color profile optimised for Indian tastes. Video are often recorded at 4K 30fps or 1080p at 60fps. 720p slow-mo recording goes up to 960fps. One among this phone's primary target audiences is video content creators, especially TikTok users, so there is a Short Video mode with a 15-second cutoff. You’ll also shoot video using the macro camera, or save RAW 8-bit footage for external processing.

The front camera features a 16-megapixel resolution, and once more the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max offers a intensify to 32 megapixels. Slow-mo up to 120fps is feasible also. There's AI beautification which is on by default.

The camera app is simple for the foremost part, but there are some quirks. As an example, you've got to open a submenu to seek out the Macro camera icon. There are 0.6x, 1x and 2x zoom selectors right above the shutter button – the primary two switch between the wide-angle and standard cameras, but the zoom is all digital. As usual, we had to manually disable Xiaomi's advertising watermark on photos.

Starting with daytime photos, we found the first camera to be reasonably good, but it doesn't break any new ground in terms of quality or flexibility. Close-ups looked good and details were clear in foreground subjects. Distant objects were also well represented if there was adequate light and textures weren't too complex. The wide-angle camera isn't regrettable, but quality definitely suffers. Despite promising distortion correction, there's still some fairly obvious warping at the edges of frames.

The 5-megapixel macro camera does deliver much higher quality shots than we have seen from most other macro cameras, and therefore the camera app makes it obvious when you're holding the phone at the right distance to lock focus. Many of our attempts still begin looking dull though, often with washed-out colours and poorly balanced exposures.

At night, we found the Redmi Note 9 Pro's primary camera to be good if there was many artificial light around, otherwise details were lost. Low-light landscapes were unimpressive. The wide-angle camera delivered murky results, but we didn't expect an excessive amount of from it. Night mode was surprisingly ineffective – it did help balance dark scenes with bright lights that might otherwise just be overexposed blotches, but it didn't do anything within the least for shots of subjects in the dark, which other phones are capable of improving.

The front camera is fairly good within the daytime also as in the dark, but we didn't just like the aggressive beautification which made faces look artificial. Details were good within the daytime also as in the dark, and portrait shots had nicely blurred backgrounds.

Video shot at 1080p looked fine, with good stabilisation. Our only complaint was that our test footage was a touch overexposed. At 4K, colours went completely out of whack and our sample shots had an overwhelming, unnatural red tone. The shimmer effect was pretty bad in the dark when shooting at 1080p. An equivalent situation was evident in the dark – 1080p footage wasn't usable if we were moving, but we managed to capture usable footage if we stood still.